🔗 Share this article

A decade after the UK stumbled into a hasty public vote that split the country and triggered disorder, a advisory comes from across the Irish Sea: it might repeat.

Authorities and voters entered unwittingly Brexit and the identical could occur with a national vote on a united Ireland, triggering disturbances for which no one is prepared.

That is the message from two respected journalists from both sides of the Irish border who have collaborated to examine the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland departing the UK to establish a different country with the Republic of Ireland.

Administrative Structures Unprepared

Fintan O’Toole and Sam McBride, have determined that the government bodies in Ireland and Britain are woefully unready for a potentially contentious and transformative public vote.

"The lesson of Brexit remains unheeded, which is that events can arise suddenly and can gather momentum very quickly," the commentator remarked. "In my opinion that the governmental framework of our islands remains highly fragile."

New Title Seeks to Provoke Discussion

The team have studied the political, economic and cultural reasons for any governmental shift in a publication, For and Against a United Ireland, published by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They hope to encourage dialogue on the issue with a series of speaking events that will bring them to Westminster in the coming weeks.

"What concerns everybody, or must worry everybody, is the Brexit vote of 2016," said the analyst.

"We should prevent a referendum on a thumbs up-thumbs down, ambiguous question whose results have not been spelled out because then you find yourself with an extremely split population where the losing side are not reconciled to defeat and the victorious side are uncertain exactly what it is that they have achieved."

Governmental Mandate

Under the peace accord, the Northern Ireland government minister must arrange a public vote on Irish unity if it seems probable that a most voters would vote in favour.

Sinn Féin and other nationalists say this point is imminent, and a non-profit named pro-unification advocates has garnered backing, but both governments and pro-UK factions play down the possibility, resulting in ambiguity whether or when there might be a referendum.

Insufficient Informed Dialogue

Political rhetoric for and against unity has obscured the absence of serious debate, noted McBride.

"Individuals are often supportive or opposed the concept but the actual thinking which could extend past that to make it possible hasn't for the most part happened. A lot has gone on in scholarly circles but very few elected officials or campaigners are willing to participate with even the essentials. For instance, what sort of state might be preferred? Centralised? Federal?"

Publication's Method

In the volume, no writer advocates unity or the current situation. Both composes two essays that aim for neutrality in presenting the argument for a unified Ireland and the argument against, assembling economic and societal figures, past examples and structural examples.

Discussions encompass national emblems, taxes, medical care, pensions, sovereign debt obligations and the threat of pro-UK militancy. The aim is to inform and stimulate discussion.

"Considerable attention exists in the topic but there hasn't quite been a dialogue," said the writer. "Debate indicates an recognition of the notion that there may exist valid points on both sides."

Simultaneous Plebiscites

A referendum in Northern Ireland would simultaneously prompt one in the Republic of Ireland, where the electorate report they prefer unity but refuse paying higher taxes or adopting a new flag to reflect pro-UK communities' British identity.

"Authorities in Dublin must establish what the offer from pro-unification movements is aside from just declaring: 'We desire a unified Ireland and we welcome you'," said O’Toole.

Possibility of Referendum

McBride considers a referendum in his era is likely and that it may take place suddenly. "It is possible just a irresponsible or a ill-advised or a feckless secretary of state who states: 'Let's just do this and get it out of the way.'"

Both nationalists and unionists have credible, valid perspectives, he commented. "One side will succeed here and somebody will ultimately lose but both parties has possesses something to acquire from the opposing arguments."

Request for Broader Dialogue

Westminster must participate in the discussion, stated the analyst. "This is about your state. It's a UK matter just as much as it is an Irish matter."